ICON Web & News
Virtual Journal
Everything
Resources
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
GoodNanoGuide
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Ratings Comment
Guidelines
Links
Quick Search:
Keywords:
Search:
Search Using OECD Database
Details
Return to Previous Page
Addition or Correction
Title:
Development of risk-based nanomaterial groups for occupational exposure control
Date:
9/2012
Link to Journal Abstract
Abstract:
Given the almost limitless variety of nanomaterials, it will be virtually impossible to assess the possible occupational health hazard of each nanomaterial individually. The development of science-based hazard and risk categories for nanomaterials is needed for decision-making about exposure control practices in the workplace. A possible strategy would be to select representative (benchmark) materials from various mode of action (MOA) classes, evaluate the hazard and develop risk estimates, and then apply a systematic comparison of new nanomaterials with the benchmark materials in the same MOA class. Poorly soluble particles are used here as an example to illustrate quantitative risk assessment methods for possible benchmark particles and occupational exposure control groups, given mode of action and relative toxicity. Linking such benchmark particles to specific exposure control bands would facilitate the translation of health hazard and quantitative risk information to the development of effective exposure control practices in the workplace. A key challenge is obtaining sufficient dose–response data, based on standard testing, to systematically evaluate the nanomaterials’ physical–chemical factors influencing their biological activity. Categorization processes involve both science-based analyses and default assumptions in the absence of substance-specific information. Utilizing data and information from related materials may facilitate initial determinations of exposure control systems for nanomaterials.
Non-technical Summary:
The development of science-based hazard and risk categories for nanomaterials is needed for decision-making about exposure control practices in the workplace. A possible strategy would be to select representative (benchmark) materials from various mode of action (MOA) classes, evaluate the hazard and develop risk estimates, and then apply a systematic comparison of new nanomaterials with the benchmark materials in the same MOA class. In this paper, poorly soluble particles are used here as an example to illustrate quantitative risk assessment methods for possible benchmark particles and occupational exposure control groups, given mode of action and relative toxicity.
Content Emphasis
Peer Reviewed Journal Article
Exposure Or Hazard Target
Mammalian
Exposure Pathway
Other/Unspecified
Method Of Study
Computational and System Modeling
Paper Type
Commentaries
Particle Type
Other/Unspecified
Production Method
Engineered
Risk Exposure Group
General Population
Target Audience
Technical Research
Citation:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 14(9): 1029 (September 2012)
Publication:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research
Author:
Kuempel ED, Castranova V, Geraci CL, Schulte PA
Volume:
14
Number:
9
Pages:
1029
Last updated on October 19, 2012
Permalink
Join Us
|
About
|
Newsroom
|
Working Groups
|
Projects
|
Resources
|
Virtual Journal
|
Events
|
Logout
This work is supported in part by the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Initiative of the National Science Foundation
under NSF Award Number EEC-0118007.
Why Join Us?
Mission and Strategy
Background
Organization
Sponsors
Participants
Contact Us
ICON Releases
News
Media Alert
RSS
Governance
Knowledge Base
Best Practices
Communications
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
Good Nano Guide
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Links
Council Events
Other Events
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
The GoodNanoGuide
Nano EHS Research Needs
Current Practices Survey