ICON Web & News
Virtual Journal
Everything
Resources
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Links
Quick Search:
Keywords:
Search:
Search Using OECD Database
Details
Return to Previous Page
Addition or Correction
Title:
Community Engagement to Facilitate, Legitimize and Accelerate the Advancement of Nanotechnologies in Australia
Date:
10/2009
Link to Journal Abstract
Abstract:
There are increasing calls internationally for the development of regulation and policies related to the rapidly growing nanotechnologies sector. As part of the process of policy formation, it is widely accepted that deliberative community engagement processes should be included, enabling publics to have a say about nanotechnologies, expressing their hopes and fears, issues and concerns, and that these will be considered as part of the policy process. The Australian Federal and State governments have demonstrated a commitment to these ideals, undertaking a number of public engagement activities in recent years. However, despite promises that these community engagement activities will enable policy makers to identify complex and contested community attitudes, and that these will be included as part of the policy making process, a closer look at Australia’s engagement activities reveals something quite different. Through an analysis of a number of Australia’s nano-engagement activities, this paper demonstrates the limits of public engagement related to the development of nanotechnology related policies and regulation in Australia. Our analysis reveals the extent to which industry interests have captured policy makers and regulators, dissenting voices have been excluded from engagement processes, and engagement processes have not connected with actual policy making activities. Reflecting on these limits, this paper concludes with recommendations for improving public engagement processes related to nanotechnologies in Australia.
Non-technical Summary:
Through an analysis of a number of Australia’s nano-engagement activities, this paper evaluates public engagement related to the development of nanotechnology related policies and regulation in Australia.
Content Emphasis
Peer Reviewed Journal Article
Exposure Or Hazard Target
Other/Unspecified
Exposure Pathway
Other/Unspecified
Method Of Study
Other
Paper Type
Commentaries
Particle Type
Other/Unspecified
Production Method
Engineered
Risk Exposure Group
General Population
Target Audience
Public Policy
Citation:
NanoEthics, 2009, Online First, DOI: 10.1007/s11569-009-0070-2
Publication:
Nanoethics
Author:
Lyons K, Whelan J
Volume:
Online First
Last updated on November 2, 2009
Permalink
Join Us
|
About
|
Newsroom
|
Working Groups
|
Projects
|
Resources
|
Virtual Journal
|
Events
|
Logout
This work is supported in part by the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Initiative of the National Science Foundation
under NSF Award Number EEC-0118007.
Why Join Us?
Mission and Strategy
Background
Organization
Sponsors
Participants
Contact Us
ICON Releases
News
Media Alert
RSS
Governance
Knowledge Base
Best Practices
Communications
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Links
Council Events
Other Events
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
The GoodNanoGuide
Nano EHS Research Needs
Current Practices Survey