ICON Web & News
Virtual Journal
Everything
Resources
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
GoodNanoGuide
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Ratings Comment
Guidelines
Links
Quick Search:
Keywords:
Search:
Search Using OECD Database
Details
Return to Previous Page
Addition or Correction
Title:
Appropriate In Vitro Methods for Genotoxicity Testing of Silver Nanoparticles
Date:
2/2013
Link to Journal Abstract
Abstract:
Objectives
We investigated the genotoxic effects of 40-59 nm silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) by bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test), in vitro comet assay and micronucleus (MN) assay. In particular, we directly compared the effect of cytochalasin B (cytoB) and rat liver homogenate (S9 mix) in the formation of MN by Ag-NPs. Methods Before testing, we confirmed that Ag-NPs were completely dispersed in the experimental medium by sonication (three times in 1 minute) and filtration (0.2 µm pore size filter), and then we measured their size in a zeta potential analyzer. After that the genotoxicity were measured and especially, S9 mix and with and without cytoB were compared one another in MN assay. Results Ames test using Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 strains revealed that Ag-NPs with or without S9 mix did not display a mutagenic effect. The genotoxicity of Ag-NPs was also evaluated in a mammalian cell system using Chinese hamster ovary cells. The results revealed that Ag-NPs stimulated DNA breakage and MN formation with or without S9 mix in a dose-dependent manner (from 0.01 µg/mL to 10 µg/mL). In particular, MN induction was affected by cytoB. Conclusions All of our findings, with the exception of the Ames test results, indicate that Ag-NPs show genotoxic effects in mammalian cell system. In addition, present study suggests the potential error due to use of cytoB in genotoxic test of nanoparticles.
Non-technical Summary:
For this study, the authors investigated the genotoxic effects of 40-59 nm silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) by bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test), in vitro comet assay and micronucleus (MN) assay.
Content Emphasis
Peer Reviewed Journal Article
Exposure Or Hazard Target
Mammalian
Exposure Pathway
Other/Unspecified
Method Of Study
In Vitro
Paper Type
Hazard
Particle Type
Metal
Production Method
Engineered
Risk Exposure Group
General Population
Target Audience
Technical Research
Citation:
Environmental Health and Toxicology, 2013, 28:e2013003 (8 pp)
Publication:
Environmental Health and Toxicology
Author:
Kim HR, Park YJ, Shin DY, Oh SM, Chung KH
Volume:
2013
Number:
e2013003
Pages:
(8 pp)
Last updated on March 14, 2013
Permalink
Join Us
|
About
|
Newsroom
|
Working Groups
|
Projects
|
Resources
|
Virtual Journal
|
Events
|
Logout
This work is supported in part by the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Initiative of the National Science Foundation
under NSF Award Number EEC-0118007.
Why Join Us?
Mission and Strategy
Background
Organization
Sponsors
Participants
Contact Us
ICON Releases
News
Media Alert
RSS
Governance
Knowledge Base
Best Practices
Communications
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
Good Nano Guide
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Links
Council Events
Other Events
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
The GoodNanoGuide
Nano EHS Research Needs
Current Practices Survey