ICON Web & News
Virtual Journal
Everything
Resources
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
GoodNanoGuide
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Ratings Comment
Guidelines
Links
Quick Search:
Keywords:
Search:
Search Using OECD Database
Details
Return to Previous Page
Addition or Correction
Title:
International Trend of Guidance for Nanomaterial Risk Assessment
Date:
2/2013
Link to Journal Abstract
Abstract:
In the past few years, several kinds of opinions or recommendations on the nanomaterial safety assessment have been published from international or national bodies. Among the reports, the first practical guidance of risk assessment from the regulatory body was published from the European Food Safety Authorities in May 2011, which included the determination of exposure scenario and toxicity testing strategy. In October 2011, European Commission (EC) adopted the definition of “nanomaterial” for regulation. And more recently, Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety of EC released guidance for assessment of nanomaterials in cosmetics in June 2012. A series of activities in EU marks an important step towards realistic safety assessment of nanomaterials. On the other hand, the US FDA announced a draft guidance for industry in June 2011, and then published draft guidance documents for both “Cosmetic Products” and “Food Ingredients and Food Contact Substances” in April 2012. These draft documents do not restrictedly define the physical properties of nanomaterials, but when manufacturing changes alter the dimensions, properties, or effects of an FDA-regulated product, the products are treated as new products. Such international movements indicate that most of nanomaterials with any new properties would be assessed or regulated as new products by most of national authorities in near future, although the approaches are still case by case basis. We will introduce such current international activities and consideration points for regulatory risk assessment.
Non-technical Summary:
This paper covers current international activities and consideration points for regulatory risk assessment, with specific emphasis on EU and US FDA initiatives. (Paper in Japanese)
Content Emphasis
Peer Reviewed Journal Article
Exposure Or Hazard Target
Other/Unspecified
Exposure Pathway
Other/Unspecified
Method Of Study
Other
Paper Type
Commentaries
Particle Type
Other/Unspecified
Production Method
Engineered
Risk Exposure Group
General Population
Target Audience
Other
Citation:
Yakugaku Zasshi: Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, 2013, 133(2): 175-180
Publication:
Yakugaku Zasshi: Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
Author:
Hirose A
Volume:
133
Number:
2
Pages:
175-180
Last updated on February 8, 2013
Permalink
Join Us
|
About
|
Newsroom
|
Working Groups
|
Projects
|
Resources
|
Virtual Journal
|
Events
|
Logout
This work is supported in part by the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Initiative of the National Science Foundation
under NSF Award Number EEC-0118007.
Why Join Us?
Mission and Strategy
Background
Organization
Sponsors
Participants
Contact Us
ICON Releases
News
Media Alert
RSS
Governance
Knowledge Base
Best Practices
Communications
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
Good Nano Guide
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Links
Council Events
Other Events
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
The GoodNanoGuide
Nano EHS Research Needs
Current Practices Survey