ICON Web & News
Virtual Journal
Everything
Resources
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
GoodNanoGuide
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Ratings Comment
Guidelines
Links
Quick Search:
Keywords:
Search:
Search Using OECD Database
Details
Return to Previous Page
Addition or Correction
Title:
Standardisation in the Field of Nanotechnology: Some Issues of Legitimacy
Date:
12/2012
Link to Journal Abstract
Abstract:
Nanotechnology will allegedly have a revolutionary impact in a wide range of fields, but has also created novel concerns about health, safety and the environment (HSE). Nanotechnology regulation has nevertheless lagged behind nanotechnology development. In 2004 the International Organization for Standardization established a technical committee for producing nanotechnology standards for terminology, measurements, HSE issues and product specifications. These standards are meant to play a role in nanotechnology development, as well as in national and international nanotechnology regulation, and will therefore have consequences for consumers, workers and the environment. This paper gives an overview of the work in the technical committee on nanotechnology and discusses some challenges with regard to legitimacy in such work. The paper focuses particularly on stakeholder involvement and the potential problems of scientific robustness when standardising in such early stages of the scientific development. The intention of the paper is to raise some important issues rather than to draw strong conclusions. However, the paper will be concluded with some suggestions for improving legitimacy in the TC 229 and a call for increased public awareness about standardisation in the field of nanotechnology.
Non-technical Summary:
This paper gives an overview of the work in the technical committee on nanotechnology, established by the International Organization for Standardization in 2004, and discusses some challenges with regard to legitimacy in such work. The paper focuses particularly on stakeholder involvement and the potential problems of scientific robustness when standardising in such early stages of the scientific development.
Content Emphasis
Review Article
Exposure Or Hazard Target
Other/Unspecified
Exposure Pathway
Other/Unspecified
Method Of Study
Other
Paper Type
Commentaries
Particle Type
Other/Unspecified
Production Method
Engineered
Risk Exposure Group
General Population
Target Audience
Other
Citation:
Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4): 719-739 (December 2012)
Publication:
Science and Engineering Ethics
Author:
Forsberg EM
Volume:
18
Number:
4
Pages:
719-739
Last updated on December 12, 2012
Permalink
Join Us
|
About
|
Newsroom
|
Working Groups
|
Projects
|
Resources
|
Virtual Journal
|
Events
|
Logout
This work is supported in part by the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Initiative of the National Science Foundation
under NSF Award Number EEC-0118007.
Why Join Us?
Mission and Strategy
Background
Organization
Sponsors
Participants
Contact Us
ICON Releases
News
Media Alert
RSS
Governance
Knowledge Base
Best Practices
Communications
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
Good Nano Guide
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Links
Council Events
Other Events
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
The GoodNanoGuide
Nano EHS Research Needs
Current Practices Survey