ICON Web & News
Virtual Journal
Everything
Resources
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
GoodNanoGuide
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Ratings Comment
Guidelines
Links
Quick Search:
Keywords:
Search:
Search Using OECD Database
Details
Return to Previous Page
Addition or Correction
Title:
Can Standard Genotoxicity Tests be Applied to Nanoparticles?
Date:
7/2012
Link to Journal Abstract
Abstract:
Experiments were conducted to determine the validity of two common genotoxicity testing procedures, the comet assay and the micronucleus (MN) test, when applied to nanoparticles (NP). The comet assay is used to detect strand breaks (SB) induced in cellular DNA. There is a possibility of obtaining false positive results, if residual NP remain in proximity to the virtually naked DNA that results from lysis of agarose-embedded cells, and react with this DNA in ways that do not occur with chromatin in intact cells. However, data showed that if NP are deliberately present at high concentration with lysed cells, there is no change in SB with a range of NP. Only oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 NP induced damage, as these particles also produced equivalent alterations in whole cells. A modification of the comet assay incorporates digestion of DNA with lesion-specific endonucleases, notably formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG), which detects oxidized purines. Again there is a concern regarding the presence of residual NP with DNA of lysed cells, but this time because of the risk of false negative results if NP interfere with the FPG reaction. However, it was found that incubation of cells with NP before treatment with a known 8-oxoguanine-inducing agent does not lead to any decrease in the yield of FPG-sensitive sites. Chromosomal damage is detected with the MN assay, which depends on the use of cytochalasin B (CB) to prevent cell division and accumulates binucleate cells. It is known that CB also inhibits endocytosis, and thus might prevent NP uptake. Data demonstrated that if NP are added to cells together with CB, fewer MN are induced. It is therefore necessary to treat cells with NP prior to CB in order to avoid interference and possible false negative results.
Non-technical Summary:
For this study, experiments were conducted to determine the validity of two common genotoxicity testing procedures, the comet assay and the micronucleus (MN) test, when applied to nanoparticles (NP).
Content Emphasis
Peer Reviewed Journal Article
Exposure Or Hazard Target
Mammalian
Exposure Pathway
Other/Unspecified
Method Of Study
Material Analysis and Applications
In Vitro
Paper Type
Hazard
Particle Type
Multiple
Production Method
Engineered
Risk Exposure Group
General Population
Target Audience
Technical Research
Citation:
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues, 2012, 75(13-15) 800-806
Publication:
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues
Author:
Magdolenova Z, Lorenzo Y, Collins A, Dusinska M
Volume:
75
Number:
13-15
Pages:
800-806
Last updated on August 15, 2012
Permalink
Join Us
|
About
|
Newsroom
|
Working Groups
|
Projects
|
Resources
|
Virtual Journal
|
Events
|
Logout
This work is supported in part by the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Initiative of the National Science Foundation
under NSF Award Number EEC-0118007.
Why Join Us?
Mission and Strategy
Background
Organization
Sponsors
Participants
Contact Us
ICON Releases
News
Media Alert
RSS
Governance
Knowledge Base
Best Practices
Communications
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
Good Nano Guide
ICON Reports
ICON Backgrounders
Glossary
Policy Reports
Links
Council Events
Other Events
Virtual Journal
Analyze Database
The GoodNanoGuide
Nano EHS Research Needs
Current Practices Survey